Archive for the ‘Periodicals’ Category

Today’s Tirade

Thursday, May 20th, 2010

This morning after I had finished bitching to John about the intellectual dishonesty, incoherence, anti-feminism, and unacknowledged condescension in the latest issue of Atlantic Monthly, I finished with this: “And that’s today’s tirade.”

“That’s a great name for a blog,” he said.

I know.

For now, it’ll have to suffice as a new category.

Anyway, you can imagine my thrill when the excellent Andi Zeisler of Bitch Magazine decided to weigh in on one of the writers whose Atlantic article I had just read: muddled anti-feminist and pretend-fact maker-upper Caitlin Flanagan. (Hiss.) Zeisler gives Flanagan a well-deserved Douchebag Decree award. Hallelujah!

While I’m tirade-ing, I’d like to give Honorable Douchebag Mention to James Parker for his commentary on Lady Gaga, which while offering some keen insights on Gaga’s style is tonally contemptuous in a way it never acknowledges. Nobody has to like La Gaga—but if you hate her, please explain.

And don’t pretend that fancy-pants cultural critique (of which I’m a fan) protects you from emotional involvement. It doesn’t. [See: Four years at Yale.]

Plus Parker ends with the cheap trick of pronouncing Gaga the “end of pop,” which is so obviously wrong (pop is never over) it can’t be meant to mean anything.

Atlantic Monthly! Writing has to mean something. You can’t just throw a bunch of unconnected and contradictory darts at a board. Or, you can, but that’s dadaism, and it’s not what you’re going for.

New editor, anyone?

More NYer Love

Sunday, May 2nd, 2010

Since we all can agree the world revolves around me, I think it won’t come as a surprise that The New Yorker chose this week’s edition—arriving mere minutes after my previous post!—to publish exactly the kind of article I love and admire.

(Also of note in this issue: Both features, the humor piece, and the short story are by women, which means the entire top half of the TOC is swimming in estrogen. It’s a fresh breath of ahh!)

The article is reporter Janet Malcolm’s 30-page (!) piece on a riveting murder trial in Queens. The title: “Iphigenia in Forest Hills.” Thrilling! I’d never have been able to get a title like that past any editors I’ve worked for, but at the NYer, you’re allowed to refer to Greek mythology—even slightly obscure Greek mythology. (Here’s to you, Mrs. Marek, my genius 10th-grade English teacher, for syllabizing both Sophocles’ and Anouilh’s Antigone.)

Anyway, while I was a little surprised by Malcolm’s insertion of self into the article—there’s a fair amount of commentary about what it was like to sit through a weeks-long murder trial, and at one point she does something that has the potential to affect the verdict—I also enjoyed it. I’m always hoping for that sort of thing in reportage, since I think objectivity is a pose and an illusion. Shocking, right?  I’m the first person to notice!

The trial itself is both enraging (bastard judge doesn’t give defendant a fair trial) and beguiling (defendant probably did it—but how could she?), so there’s much to mull.

It reminds me of this piece, even more enraging as a miscarriage of justice but far less morally ambiguous in its outcome. As a piece of journalism, also top-notch.

New Yorker, I love you. Please never die.

Grumpy Magazine Screed

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

Why is there only one New Yorker? As in, why is there only one general interest magazine in which the writing is reliably strong and the topics consistently both relevant and entertaining?

I’m always trying to find another. I tried Harper’s for years, but a) they’ve never heard of women; and b) they’re interested almost exclusively in politics and war. It’s pretty astonishing: Every few years, I try another issue, hoping that things have changed. They haven’t.

Just look at the TOC! Bylines are men, men, men. Topics are war, war, war. For the record, I’ll say that I recognize that the world is awash in politics and war, and as a responsible citizen I am supposed to have a basic grasp of same. I do. I get it on NPR.

And given that I’m already doing whatever I’m going to be doing by way of activism (i.e., voting, some emailing, and contributing to causes I care about), I humbly posit that more information entering my already-rattled nervous system isn’t going to improve anything for anyone.

Then there’s the Atlantic, which seems like it should be the answer, but never is. Why is the Atlantic so boring? Why are its articles often incoherent? (Did you read the latest OMG OBESITY ALARMISM cover story? Wha?) Why is its fiction—at least in the latest fiction supplement—so grim? There’s something weird going on in editorial there. Something anti-Melissa-y.

I am a fan of The Sun, with reservations. It’s pretty one-noted. I like that one note, which is deeply felt emotional and personal exploration, usually landing at grief/wonder. But issue after issue of that tends to result in a mega-blur.

And, in addition to mockably titled environmental magazines like Home Power and Earth Island Journal, John gets Wired, which we both read cringe-ingly, absorbing the technolust and corporate cheerleading while sometimes being authentically interested in the topic.

Readers, help me out. Which magazines do you read?

Dwell: For Rich People

Friday, October 9th, 2009

I have this problem with Dwell magazine, also known as My Monthly Dose of Covetousness. I want nearly everything in it, especially the sleekly modern, architecturally inventive homes with soaring glass, rich wood, and minimalist furniture. (They always have clever nooks, too. I am a sucker for clever nooks.) Problem: I am not a rich person.

This month as I was paging through the issue, I had this thought: They should have warnings in this magazine. Every few pages, there should be some sort of caveat. Example: This home is for rich people. Following page: You are not a rich person. Next one: It is not wise for you to imagine owning this home. A few pages later: That will only cause you pain. Tear-out insert: Sorry, but it’s true. Couple of pages later: Really. Totally true. Inside of back cover: No matter what you are currently thinking.

Those warnings wouldn’t work, though. For whatever reason, I persist in the fantasy that I will some day design and build (with the help of an architect and, you know, John) a custom modern home in a lush green landscape. For this reason, I have every issue of Dwell I’ve received stacked in a bookcase in the entryway of our home. For ideas.

Help.